Course syllabus in pdf and Word formats. (Does not reflect changes made below.)
Changes to Syllabus
Please take note of the following changes to the syllabus:
For Monday, December 4, 2006, do not read the INS v. AP opinion. The new (much shorter) assignment is: Contract (848-64).
[Posted 10/4/06] I have significantly modified the next two reading assignments--for Monday, 10/9 and Wednesday, 10/11--to allow us to catch up. For these two dates, please disregard the assignments in the syllabus and that have appeared previously on this website. The new assignments are:
Monday, 10/9/06: Review ENTIRE assignment from Wednesday, October 4th, and read Memorandum-Decision and Order [pdf] in Rescuecom Corp. v. Google (Sept. 28, 2006)
Wednesday, 10/11/06: AMF Inc. v. Sleekcraft Boats (709-16); Problems 5-7 and 5-8 (721); Dilution (721-35).
For Wednesday, September 27, 2006, in addition to the reading listed in the syllabus, skim pages 159-164 ("Procedures for Obtaining a Patent")
The new assignment is:
Wednesday, 9/27/06: Procedures for Obtaining a Patent (skim 159-164) and Doctrine of Equivalents: Basic Issues and Prosecution History Estoppel (263-80)
Supplemental Reading
Wednesday, 11/29/06: As specified in the syllabus, in addition to the pages assigned in the casebook, please read the following Supreme Court Opinion from last term:
MercExchange v. eBay, 126 S. Ct. 1837 (May 15, 2006) [pdf]
Wednesday, 11/15/06: In addition to pages 593-98 (skip notes) of the casebook, read the following:
Perfect 10 v. Google (C.D. Cal. Feb. 17, 2006) (This case is currently on appeal to the Ninth Circuit and, by coincidence, will be argued the same day we are discussing it.
KSR v. Teleflex, Federal Circuit Opinion [word][pdf]
KSR v. Teleflex, Patent at Issue (Image Pages Only) [pdf]
KSR v. Teleflex, Three Amici Briefs to Supreme Court [word][pdf]
(Optional) Warning: The Onion article linked here is full of off-colored language and profanities, so don't click if this will offend you. For some fun, nonobviousness-related reading compare this news story with this Onion article. The Onion article predated the real news by a year-and-a-half.
Professor Ohm's model answers for the first two questions (note that we did not discuss "trademark use" last year, which might have figured into Question 1 but is not mentioned in this model answer).