<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Copyright - Spring 2008 - Review Q and A   </title>
    <link>http://paulohm.com/classes/copr08/blog/blosxom.cgi</link>
    <description>Copyright - Spring 2008 - Review Q&A</description>
    <language>en</language>

  <item>
    <title>You're On Your Own.  Good Luck!</title>
    <link>http://paulohm.com/classes/copr08/blog/blosxom.cgi/2008/04/30#NoMoreQuestions</link>
    <description>
The deadline for questions to the professor has passed.  Also, I have
posted all of the student Q&amp;A's that I plan to post, so you need not
check back here once you've seen this post.&lt;p&gt;

Good luck everybody.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Uncopyrightable Material and the Copying Prong.</title>
    <link>http://paulohm.com/classes/copr08/blog/blosxom.cgi/2008/04/30#CopyingProng</link>
    <description>
&lt;em&gt;Q: When proving copying in infringement, can you consider
non-copyrighted material?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;p&gt;

A: Yes.  This is why I keep saying that the four fake entries in
Feist, even though almost certainly uncopyrightable, can still be used
to satisfy the &quot;copying&quot; prong of the infringement test.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Works for Hire and Terminations of Transfer.</title>
    <link>http://paulohm.com/classes/copr08/blog/blosxom.cgi/2008/04/30#ToT</link>
    <description>
&lt;em&gt;It is my understanding that works for hire can not be terminated.  Is that the case?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;p&gt;

Yes.  See section 203(a).</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Derivative Works and Fixation.</title>
    <link>http://paulohm.com/classes/copr08/blog/blosxom.cgi/2008/04/28#DerivativeWorks</link>
    <description>
&lt;em&gt;Q: I wanted to check my understanding of the adaptation right and
copyright in derivative works. Is the following correct?&lt;p&gt;

According to the legislative history of section 106, a derivative
performance that isn't fixed, like a ballet or an improvisation, can
infringe the right to prepare derivative works. However, if the
copyright owner himself prepares a derivative work that isn't fixed or
gives someone permission to do so, that derivative work would not
qualify for its own copyright protection under 103 because it isn't
fixed. Additionally, even if the derivative work were fixed, it would
require &quot;originality plus&quot; to qualify for copyright protection.&lt;p&gt;

My main question concerns the ability of an unfixed derivative work to
infringe versus receive its own copyright protection.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;p&gt;

A: Correct, and well stated.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>About the Law of Transfers and Licenses.</title>
    <link>http://paulohm.com/classes/copr08/blog/blosxom.cgi/2008/04/28#Transfers</link>
    <description>
This semester, we skipped the reading on transfers and licenses.  A
student just pointed out to me that there are many, many issues in
review problem one from the Spring 2007 exam that turn on these
issues.  For this reason, aspects of this question will probably seem
somewhat mysterious to you.</description>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Welcome.</title>
    <link>http://paulohm.com/classes/copr08/blog/blosxom.cgi/2008/04/25#firstpost</link>
    <description>
Welcome to the student question and answer blog for Professor Ohm's
Spring 2008 Copyright course.  During the exam period, I will post
student questions with my answers on this page.  &lt;p /&gt;

I am not posting every single student question.  Instead, I am only
posting student questions that I believe the class, as a whole, will
benefit from hearing.  Some questions are too basic to deserve
attention.  Other questions are too advanced and nuanced.  So don't
take it personally if your question doesn't appear here.  (Do take it
personally if I don't respond to one of your questions.  I might have
forgotten to get to it, so if you don't hear from me in a day or two,
please ask again.)</description>
  </item>
  </channel>
</rss>